• Home
  • What's RP
  • Web Links
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Videos
  • YouTube
  • Presentations
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
Introductory Articles
[Back to Articles]

A Primer for Restorative Practices in Schools

These seven short articles give a good introduction to the field of Restorative Practices in Schools:

  1. Restorative justice in everyday life: Beyond the formal ritual  Wachtel, T., & McCold, P. (2001). In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres

  2. SaferSanerSchools: Transforming school culture with restorative practices Mirsky, L. (2003). Retrieved 28th August, 2003

  3. Restorative justice in schools. Hopkins, B. (2002). Support for Learning, 17(3)

  4. Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive?  Cameron, L., & Thorsborne, M. (2001). [pdf] In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  5. Restorative justice and school violence: Building theory and practice Morrison, B. (2001). Paper presented at the International Conference on Violence in Schools and Public Policies, Palais de l'UNESCO, Paris.

  6. Empathy development in youth through restorative practices. Pranis, K. (2000). Public Service Psychology, 25(2).

  7. The Role of Language in Creating School Community. Restorative Practices for Schools: A Resource by the Restorative Practices Development Team at the University of Waikato



Additional Introductory Articles:

Educational discipline using the principles of restorative justice.  Halstead, S. (1999).[pdf] Journal of Correctional Discipline, 2003.
  • This article shows how restorative justice techniques can be used with students in correctional and alternative education settings. The simple principles of restorative justice are outlined and their suitability for offenders is illustrated through actual prison incidents that have been dealt with using these principles. A protocol is suggested for teachers and administrators who might consider adopting this approach.
In pursuit of paradigm: A theory of restorative justice  McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2003, 10-15th August). [html] Paper presented at the X111 World Congress of Criminology, Rio de Janeiro.
  • In this paper, we propose a conceptual theory of restorative justice so that social scientists may test these theoretical concepts and their validity in explaining and predicting the effects of restorative justice practices. The foundational postulate of restorative justice is that crime harms people and relationships and that justice requires the healing of the harm as much as possible. Out of this basic premise arise key questions: who is harmed, what are their needs and how can those needs be met?
Transforming school culture  Piperato, D. F., & Roy, J. J. (2002, 8th-10th August).  Paper presented at the "Dreaming of a New Reality," the Third International Conference on Conferencing, Circles and other Restorative Practices, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • If today’s trends continue, education in the 21st century will be characterized by increasingly fractured relationships and even more alienated students. Closed, individualized, bureaucratic cultures typical of many schools are unable to reverse these trends. Collaboration within the schoolhouse and beyond is critical to meeting the individual needs of students. Just as industry moved from mass production to mass customization, schools will need to similarly customize the educational experiences of individuals to re-engage them and to begin the restoration of relationships.
School violence and community conferencing: The benefits of restorative justice  Thorsborne, M. (2000).[pdf] Paper presented at the Healthy School Communities: APAPDC National Online Conference 2000.
  • The massacre of students at the Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and copycat shootings in other US and Canadian schools have sent waves of alarm through school communities across the globe. While tough gun laws limit accessibility to the type of weapons used in those crimes here in Australia, school violence is increasingly a source of anxiety. There is no argument from this author that there is much to be done beyond the school gates to counter this harmful behaviour, and at the earliest point of intervention in the lives of our young people. Responding to such incidents in schools, though, is always a challenge. School responses to incidents of violence (including bullying), typically range from police involvement, suspension and/or exclusion, detention, to parent interviews, counselling and anger management programs. Community conferencing, first introduced to Queensland schools in 1994, is an extremely effective process for dealing with incidents of violence.
SaferSanerSchools: Restoring community in a disconnected world  Wachtel, T. (1999).Paper presented at the "Reshaping Australian Institutions Conference: Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Australian National University, Canberra.
  • We need a more useful way of looking at school discipline and social discipline than the limited punitive-permissive continuum—to punish or not to punish. We need to look through a social discipline window comprised of both control and support.

 

Youth development circles
  Braithwaite, J. (2001). [pdf] Oxford Review of Education, 27(2), 239-252.
  • Restorative justice circles or conferences have shown considerable promise in the criminal justice system as a more decent and effective way of dealing with youthful law breaking than punishment. The social movement for restorative justice has a distinctive analysis of the crisis of community and the possibility of community in late modernity. This paper raises the question of whether this approach might fruitfully be applied to the holistic development of the learning potential of the young and the whole range of problems young people encounter—drug abuse, unemployment, homelessness, suicide, among others— in the transition from school to work.
Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice  Morris, A. (2002). British Journal of Criminology, 42, 596-615.
  • Restorative justice has been subject to a number of attacks, both empirically and philosophically. This paper attempts to address some of these criticisms and suggests that they stem in part from misunderstandings about what restorative justice seeks to achieve and in part from demanding too much from restorative justice at this stage in its development. Attempts to evaluate restorative justice are also relatively recent. Critics, however, tend to either ignore the available research findings or to present them negatively. Critics also fail to contrast what restorative justice has achieved and may still achieve with what conventional criminal justice systems have achieved. Drawing from research, particularly from New Zealand, which has put restorative justice principles into practice to a greater extent than other jurisdictions, this review suggests that there are reasons to be relatively positive about the re‐emergence of restorative justice.

The Difference between 'Mediation' and RP ~

The Differences between Mediation and Restorative Justice/Practices  Brookes, D & McDonough, I (2006). [pdf]  Unpublished manuscript. (Thanks to Marg Armstrong for this link.)
  • Over the past few years, many practitioners in Scotland have come to recognise the importance of distinguishing restorative justice or restorative practices from mediation.
Restorative Justice in Scottish Schools - a response to Brookes and McDonough Belinda Hopkins Unpublished manuscript (Thanks to Belinda Hopkins)
  • The paper (above) by Derek Brookes and Ian McDonough raises some very interesting and important issues points. However many of the suggestions they make are, in the view of this author, at odds with the way the field is developing both in Scotland and internationally. Hopefully this response will help to clarify how and why the work in schools has developed in the way that is has in the past seven years or so, and why this author thinks that the direction this work has taken is the right one.